Analysts can arrive at slightly different results depending on the precise details of the implementation, such as the number of past seasons that are used in the projection, how they are weighted, how much the result is regressed toward the League average, and the version of a natural aging curve that is used. However, the end results should be roughly the same.
It seems overly pessimistic to predict that Burns will score 66.1 points after back-to-back seasons of 75 and 76. Also, his 320 shots on goal last season made him the second player other than Washington Capitals forward Alex Ovechkin of the Washington Capitals to lead the NHL in shots since 2005-06; Pittsburgh Penguins center Evgeni Malkin is the other (339 in 2011-12). On the surface, that doesn't appear to be a player whose scoring will suddenly drop by 10 points.
Digging deeper into the numbers, this more modest projection is a result of the natural decline expected at his age, 32, his more modest scoring totals prior to 2015-16, and San Jose's unexpectedly high shooting percent when Burns was on the ice at 5-on-5, which increased from an average of 7.8 percent from 2011-16 to 9.0 percent in 2016-17.
To get a second perspective, I searched NHL history back to the 1967-68 season to find the 10 defensemen with the most similar era-adjusted scoring statistics at a similar age, and wound up with an even more modest scoring projection of 60 points.
The closest historical comparable is Rob Blake, who won the Norris Trophy in 1997-98, was a finalist in 1999-00 and 2001-02, and was named to the Hockey Hall of Fame in 2014. At age 32, his scoring declined from a three-year weighted average of 0.78 points per game to 0.60 - a reduction of 27.0 percent.
Regardless of age, it's not that surprising to project a scoring downturn for a Norris Trophy winner. By definition, that's because players are having their best seasons when they are in the mix for the Norris, and they often have no direction to go but down.