SAY WHAT - 'DOMINATED THE SECOND HALF'

LINDHOLM ON BATTLING BACK:

ON WHEN THEIR GAME CAME AROUND:

"Right away (in the second). Playing well. I thought we had a lot of o-zone time and a lot of chances, so the last two periods, we were playing well. Just have to play that way in the first and bury our chances and we could have won the game."

ANDERSSON ON HOW IT PLAYED OUT:

"Sloppy start, sloppy first period. Then in the second and third, I thought we were the better team. We had some long o-zone shifts and were creating some looks, but Demko was kind of standing on his head. Second, third and overtime, we probably deserved to get that extra point, but it doesn't happen. It's frustrating, but we move on."

ON TAKING OVER THE GAME:

"We were generating, generating, but Demko makes some highlight-reel saves and we don't put the 3-2 goal in. It's tough, obviously, with the situation we're in. But two games left."

SUTTER ON GETTING A SINGLE POINT:

"You know what, I think Vancouver came out flying in the first period. I thought we played a decent period and the shorty could have killed us. Soft play. We slowly took over in a lot of areas and then we couldn't solve Demko. Fought back. Couldn't ask for much more than that.
"I would say we dominated the second half of the game."

ON LINDHOLM'S NIGHT:

"Played a lot of minutes. He was out there for a lot of faceoffs, scored the goal early in the third to get us back in it. Penalty kill. Involved in all parts of the game. I thought the line was really, really good. Dillon had a lot of jump."

ON A WILD OVERTIME PERIOD:

"Could have been four or five goals."