"We're putting the finishing touches on the scouting year," Treliving said shortly after the final meeting wrapped up at the KeyBank Center, home of the Sabres. "You get some time (roughly 20 minutes with each other) in the interview process, and then there are some that we spend some time on, individually, away from the arena, in the evening.
"It's always good to get to dive into their personality, spend some time with them, put a face to name and try to tie everything together, so it's been a productive week.
>> RELATED:
Elite Stature
>> RELATED:
Draft Mailbag
>> RELATED:
No Pain, No Gain
>> RELATED:
Close Obversation
>> RELATED:
Combing the Combine
>> RELATED:
Firestarter Podcast: Ryan van Asten
Treliving, Director of Amateur Scouting Tod Button and the Flames initiated the process on Monday, interviewing 74 of the 103 prospects on hand, naturally omitting some of the top selections like Jack Hughes and Bowen Byram, due to a later appearance in the draft order.
(Finnish winger Kaapo Kakko - the projected second-overall pick - is not in attendance this week, choosing to stay home and celebrate the gold medal he won less than a week ago at the IIHF World Hockey Championship.)
Each team was given a 20- or 40-minute window to speak with each player, formally, upon request.
Matt Brown - the Flames' Mental Performance Coach - took charge of the questioning, focusing more on the player's personal life than his on-ice performance.
And above all, comfort was key. The Flames had no interest in lobbing any hardballs or off-the-wall-type queries that have, traditionally, made waves at this event.
"It's a job interview for them, right?" Button said. "You want them to feel at ease and you don't want them to feel nervous. The testing, you've got all these eyes and cameras on you, so they're naturally going to be nervous.
"But for us, the one thing I try to convey to agents and players and parents, is that this is a starting point for them. This isn't the end of their journey - this is the beginning. So, how they test, it's significant, but it's insignificant in terms of the overall evaluation.
"If you test poorly, you know you've got a lot of room to grow and you've got a lot of work to do, but you can be specific as to what that work is now going forward.
"That's what we use it for."