When Lindy Ruff and Seth Appert say they spent time this summer working through the power play, believe them.
Hours upon hours were spent analyzing film, dissecting opponents’ man advantages and sifting through the numbers. In the process, Appert – who largely spearheads the power-play group – and Ruff involved Buffalo’s analytics department, which gave the coaches a report that was comprehensive, to say the least.
“We watched a lot of video together this summer, but the report to me was 50, 60 pages,” Appert said.
The players, though, don’t read 50 or 60 pages of raw data – Appert says he slimmed it down to just five or six pages for the skaters, who received the numbers earlier on in camp. Monday morning marked just the second day the Sabres worked on the power play in practice, but what happens on the ice is just the tip of the iceberg.
“I do think it's helpful just to know what's working around the league and what other teams are having success with, so we can kind of try to focus on that a bit,” said Jack Quinn, who will likely continue to play a decent role on Buffalo’s power play this year.
A lot of that work, Appert said, is examining the success – or lack thereof – other teams had on the man advantage. The Colorado Avalanche power play took up a lot of airtime in the Buffalo video room, namely due to their mediocre 2025-26 numbers (17.1%, 27th in NHL) despite having the likes of Nathan MacKinnon, Cale Makar and other prolific offensive stars on the unit.
“If it was simply based on talent, Colorado should be in the top five, if not higher, in the league, right?” Appert said “… Some things that make you a really good five-on-five player from a talent perspective don't always translate into power-play success. Usually, the power-play units that have the chemistry, mixed with the hockey IQ and the ability to think and solve problems together and individually, tend to be the units that have the most success, and then obviously being good around the net.”


















