Despite dominating the second period, the Panthers entered the second intermission losing.
How? Well, there was certainly more than a bit of controversy behind that.
At 2:37 of the middle frame, a shot from Namestnikov bounced off the cross bar and then off Roberto Luongo, sending the goaltender diving on top of the loose puck as it approached the goal line. Almost immediately, it was signaled a good goal, which gave the Rangers a 3-2 lead.
There was, however, a problem: the puck was never seen crossing the goal line. Unfortunately, despite no evidence of a good goal to be found, the goal was upheld and the original call stuck.
"I saw about 37 replays on the jumbotron and couldn't tell when it crossed the line, but [the official] told me he saw it go in," Luongo said. "I wasn't sure. After I made the save, I knew it was behind me and laying somewhere. I just tried to lay down and it looked like I had laid on it."
Here is the official explanation of the decision from the NHL Situation Room:
"The Referee informed the Situation Room they had the puck completely crossing the goal line. After reviewing all available replays, the video review could not conclusively determine that the puck did not cross the goal line, therefore the original call stands - good goal New York Rangers."
"That controversial call obviously affected the game," Boughner said. "I think it should have been 2-2 going into the third. I'm confused. I still don't understand. I've watched the replay over, I don't know, 20 times and there's still no puck that goes into the net. I'm not sure why that evidence isn't evidence enough to overturn it."