"They made us pay for sure," Little said. "But other than that, it's not like they were getting 3-on-2s and 2-on-1s the rest of the night. Those breakdowns were pretty much it, but they cost us."
Once Tomas Tatar gave the Golden Knights a 1-0 lead 13:23 into the game, the Jets wandered to an out-of-sync attack for too long, coach Paul Maurice said.
"We really got out of our routes and our patience at that point," he said. "I liked our first 10 minutes. The way the game was played after, we got control of it (but) can't get it clean. In part you have to give them credit: real good sticks on the puck, real hard. We didn't feel we started poorly at all. We didn't do a whole lot of clean things with the puck, but they were good. They were on the puck and didn't make it easy."
One of Winnipeg's strengths this season was remaining patient no matter how a game was moving along or what the score was. It was one of the biggest improvements of 2017-18 after impatience in those areas were its Achilles' heel last season, when it missed the playoffs.
"The (issue) that cost us, I think, is that we pushed too early, got out of our routes too early," Maurice said. "Then the second piece of that was what I'd said earlier, is that we didn't do anything clean, we didn't do anything quickly. That part, I think, was true of the whole game, and we want to be better there."
The Jets won 4-2 in Game 1 thanks to a quick start and some snappy execution for a 3-0 first-period lead. Along with some impatience, another difference in Game 2 was a sharper performance from the Golden Knights.
"We knew they were going to come out faster; I don't think anybody in here minded our start," defenseman Jacob Trouba said. "We liked it. We had some good chances, they capitalized on theirs. We knew they were going to be faster and that there would be more battles, and that's kind of where the game was different."