He saw it go off that post, and his only reaction was, as he put it, "Panic. Pure panic."
The bench was trying to help nudge the puck in.
"I've never seen that. That's like mini golf," Blues coach Ken Hitchcock said, laughing.
Fabbri celebrated, he estimated, three separate times.
"I thought I got it the first time," Brouwer said. "When you're not expecting for it to come back out, I think I even almost tried to kick it at some point too. I got it on the last one, falling down. In that time of the game, you can't afford to miss your opportunities. So I wasn't going to be denied."
He was happy. He was relieved. He joked, after it was all over, that had he not put that one in, he might have quit hockey. Fortunately for the Blues, that wasn't necessary.
This was a spot Brouwer knew. He had been here, over and over again. Seven consecutive Game 7s, as series after series went the distance. His most recent had come last season, as his Washington Capitals went up 3-1 in their second-round series before falling in three straight to the New York Rangers.
Brouwer would not let that happen again.
After the Blues had given up a two-goal lead -- one that had Scottrade Center electric, shaking and shuddering under the weight of years of expectations -- it was Brouwer who spoke up, along with Steve Ott. The rest of this team has a middling amount of experience, many in the 30-game region in the Stanley Cup Playoffs. Ott had 50 games before Monday. Brouwer had 84, including those six previous chances at a deciding game.
They talked, telling their teammates to stick with the game plan, to make good things happen. That was what they had intended all along, to stop the Blackhawks from finding their momentum. And then Brouwer went a step further, scoring the game-winner, tallying his first playoff goal after a stretch of 23 straight games without one.
He said it hadn't mattered to him, he hadn't thought much about it, that it was about the team. He knew that a significant part of his assignment, in the game and the series, had been to keep Jonathan Toews, Patrick Kane and Chicago's offensive threats away from the net. He and his line mostly succeeded. That was, in all likelihood, the difference.