"The power-play goals obviously were a big part of it," Agnew said. "I thought San Jose's power play really gave them momentum. Just before they scored, [Joe] Pavelski missed a shot - it went over the net or something - so it looked to me like that was a little bit of a swing, and then obviously his goal early in the third."
That made it a one-goal game, with the Sharks leading 4-3 throughout most of the third period, until they scored a pair of empty-net goals in the final minute. As Agnew said, "You get that one-goal lead and now there's a sense that, OK, this thing's going to come down to a goalie-out situation. Let's make sure we stay structured, let's make sure we get pucks deep. And I think San Jose did a good job in the third of making sure that happened."
There was another strategy San Jose employed that Agnew made note of, one that might have thrown the Blues off their game a bit.
"I thought San Jose used the back of the net well," Agnew said. "So both five-on-five and five-on-four, they're making plays east-west behind the back of the net, so what you end up doing is you end up having the defensive team facing their net, which then makes it trickier to pick up on your coverages in the D zone, especially on the penalty kill, because now you're facing that and stuff's happening behind you, whereas if the puck's moving up the wall, up the boards, you can sort of peripherally see where your guy is and it's a little bit easier to keep an eye on the puck and your coverage guy.
"But when it gets behind the net, it makes it a little trickier, and I thought [the Sharks] made [the Blues] face their net a couple times, and then when they didn't use that slot, then they got it out to the point and you had two traffic goals, the screens and the tip-ins. So I thought they did a good job in the offensive zone of using the back of the net."