Skip to main content

Headlines

Situation Room

Coach's Challenge: CBJ @ TOR - 2:03 of 2nd Period

Good goal Toronto Maple Leafs

NHL.com @NHL

Situation Room: CBJ vs. TOR

Situation Room: van Riemsdyk's goal stands

The Blue Jackets challenge James van Riemsdyk's goal in the 2nd for offside, but review confirms none on the play, and the goal stands

  • 03:42 •

At 2:03 of the second period in the Blue Jackets/Maple Leafs game, Columbus requested a Coach's Challenge to review whether the Maple Leafs was off-side prior to James van Riemsdyk's goal.

After NHL Hockey Operations staff reviewed all available replays and consulted with the linesmen, the call on the ice was upheld - good goal Toronto Maple Leafs.

Since the Coach's Challenge did not result in the original call being overturned, the Columbus Blue Jackets forfeit their time-out.

--- 

Coach's Challenge 
1. A team may only request a Coach's Challenge to review the following scenarios: 

a) "Off-Side" Play Leading to a Goal 
A play that results in a "GOAL" call on the ice where the defending team asserts that the play should have been stopped by reason of an "Off-Side" infraction by the attacking team. 

b) Scoring Plays Involving Potential "Interference on the Goalkeeper" 

(i) A play that results in a "GOAL" call on the ice where the defending team asserts that the goal should have been disallowed due to "Interference on the Goalkeeper," as described in Rules 69.1, 69.3 and 69.4; or 

(ii) A play that results in a "NO GOAL" call on the ice despite the puck having entered the net, where the on-ice Officials have determined that the attacking team was guilty of "Interference on the Goalkeeper" but where the attacking team asserts: (i) there was no actual contact of any kind initiated by an attacking Player with the goalkeeper; or (ii) the attacking Player was pushed, shoved, or fouled by a defending Player causing the attacking Player to come into contact with the goalkeeper; or (iii) the attacking Player's positioning within the goal crease did not impair the goalkeeper's ability to defend his goal and, in fact, had no discernible impact on the play. 

2. A team may only request a Coach's Challenge if they have their time-out available and the Coach's Challenge must be effectively initiated prior to the resumption of play. 

3. If the Coach's Challenge does not result in the original call on the ice being overturned, the team exercising such challenge will forfeit its time-out. 

4. If the Coach's Challenge does result in the call on the ice being overturned, the team successfully exercising such challenge will retain its time-out.

View More

The NHL uses cookies, web beacons, and other similar technologies. By using NHL websites or other online services, you consent to the practices described in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy.