VISITOR
BUFFALO SABRES 2
BUFFALO SABRES
Game 20 Away Game 10
Face-off Comparison
 
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Attendance 19,204 at Tampa Bay Times Forum
Start 7:37 EST; End 9:59 EST
Game 0279
Final
HOME
1 TAMPA BAY LIGHTNING
TAMPA BAY LIGHTNING
Game 19 Home Game 11
Faceoffs Won - Faceoffs Total / Percentage
BUFFALO SABRES Zone  
# Pos Player Off. Def. Neu. TOT
9 C OTT, STEVE 2-5 / 40% 4-8 / 50% 1-2 / 50% 7-15 / 47%
 
  vs. 4 C LECAVALIER, VINCENT
2-2 / 100% 3-5 / 60% 1-2 / 50% 6-9 / 67%
 
  vs. 44 C THOMPSON, NATE
0-2 / 0%     0-2 / 0%
 
  vs. 91 C STAMKOS, STEVEN
0-1 / 0% 1-3 / 33%   1-4 / 25%
 
12 C PORTER, KEVIN 0-1 / 0% 1-4 / 25% 3-5 / 60% 4-10 / 40%
 
  vs. 4 C LECAVALIER, VINCENT
0-1 / 0% 1-2 / 50% 1-2 / 50% 2-5 / 40%
 
  vs. 11 C PYATT, TOM
    1-1 / 100% 1-1 / 100%
 
  vs. 91 C STAMKOS, STEVEN
  0-2 / 0% 1-2 / 50% 1-4 / 25%
 
19 C HODGSON, CODY 3-5 / 60% 2-6 / 33% 5-7 / 71% 10-18 / 56%
 
  vs. 4 C LECAVALIER, VINCENT
  1-3 / 33% 1-3 / 33% 2-6 / 33%
 
  vs. 11 C PYATT, TOM
1-1 / 100%   1-1 / 100% 2-2 / 100%
 
  vs. 44 C THOMPSON, NATE
2-3 / 67% 1-1 / 100% 3-3 / 100% 6-7 / 86%
 
  vs. 91 C STAMKOS, STEVEN
0-1 / 0% 0-2 / 0%   0-3 / 0%
 
25 C GRIGORENKO, MIKHAIL 0-2 / 0%   1-2 / 50% 1-4 / 25%
 
  vs. 4 C LECAVALIER, VINCENT
0-1 / 0%   0-1 / 0% 0-2 / 0%
 
  vs. 44 C THOMPSON, NATE
0-1 / 0%     0-1 / 0%
 
  vs. 67 L POULIOT, BENOIT
    1-1 / 100% 1-1 / 100%
 
29 R POMINVILLE, JASON   0-1 / 0% 1-1 / 100% 1-2 / 50%
 
  vs. 4 C LECAVALIER, VINCENT
  0-1 / 0% 1-1 / 100% 1-2 / 50%
 
55 C HECHT, JOCHEN     0-1 / 0% 0-1 / 0%
 
  vs. 67 L POULIOT, BENOIT
    0-1 / 0% 0-1 / 0%
 
63 C ENNIS, TYLER 1-1 / 100% 0-1 / 0% 3-3 / 100% 4-5 / 80%
 
  vs. 4 C LECAVALIER, VINCENT
    1-1 / 100% 1-1 / 100%
 
  vs. 11 C PYATT, TOM
1-1 / 100%     1-1 / 100%
 
  vs. 44 C THOMPSON, NATE
    1-1 / 100% 1-1 / 100%
 
  vs. 67 L POULIOT, BENOIT
  0-1 / 0%   0-1 / 0%
 
  vs. 91 C STAMKOS, STEVEN
    1-1 / 100% 1-1 / 100%
 
TAMPA BAY LIGHTNING Zone  
# Pos Player Off. Def. Neu. TOT
4 C LECAVALIER, VINCENT 6-11 / 55% 2-4 / 50% 5-10 / 50% 13-25 / 52%
 
  vs. 9 C OTT, STEVE
2-5 / 40% 0-2 / 0% 1-2 / 50% 3-9 / 33%
 
  vs. 12 C PORTER, KEVIN
1-2 / 50% 1-1 / 100% 1-2 / 50% 3-5 / 60%
 
  vs. 19 C HODGSON, CODY
2-3 / 67%   2-3 / 67% 4-6 / 67%
 
  vs. 25 C GRIGORENKO, MIKHAIL
  1-1 / 100% 1-1 / 100% 2-2 / 100%
 
  vs. 29 R POMINVILLE, JASON
1-1 / 100%   0-1 / 0% 1-2 / 50%
 
  vs. 63 C ENNIS, TYLER
    0-1 / 0% 0-1 / 0%
 
11 C PYATT, TOM   0-2 / 0% 0-2 / 0% 0-4 / 0%
 
  vs. 12 C PORTER, KEVIN
    0-1 / 0% 0-1 / 0%
 
  vs. 19 C HODGSON, CODY
  0-1 / 0% 0-1 / 0% 0-2 / 0%
 
  vs. 63 C ENNIS, TYLER
  0-1 / 0%   0-1 / 0%
 
44 C THOMPSON, NATE 0-1 / 0% 4-6 / 67% 0-4 / 0% 4-11 / 36%
 
  vs. 9 C OTT, STEVE
  2-2 / 100%   2-2 / 100%
 
  vs. 19 C HODGSON, CODY
0-1 / 0% 1-3 / 33% 0-3 / 0% 1-7 / 14%
 
  vs. 25 C GRIGORENKO, MIKHAIL
  1-1 / 100%   1-1 / 100%
 
  vs. 63 C ENNIS, TYLER
    0-1 / 0% 0-1 / 0%
 
67 L POULIOT, BENOIT 1-1 / 100%   1-2 / 50% 2-3 / 67%
 
  vs. 25 C GRIGORENKO, MIKHAIL
    0-1 / 0% 0-1 / 0%
 
  vs. 55 C HECHT, JOCHEN
    1-1 / 100% 1-1 / 100%
 
  vs. 63 C ENNIS, TYLER
1-1 / 100%     1-1 / 100%
 
91 C STAMKOS, STEVEN 6-7 / 86% 2-2 / 100% 1-3 / 33% 9-12 / 75%
 
  vs. 9 C OTT, STEVE
2-3 / 67% 1-1 / 100%   3-4 / 75%
 
  vs. 12 C PORTER, KEVIN
2-2 / 100%   1-2 / 50% 3-4 / 75%
 
  vs. 19 C HODGSON, CODY
2-2 / 100% 1-1 / 100%   3-3 / 100%
 
  vs. 63 C ENNIS, TYLER
    0-1 / 0% 0-1 / 0%
© Copyright 2013, National Hockey League  2013-02-26-22.05.00